Crossovers seed-funding competition 2013

Over the last few months in EDReC, we’ve been working with Arts Council England South-East on a project called Crossovers.  The project aimed to explore new relationships between culture, tourism and economic development.  In the Spring, we’ll be publishing a report on the ‘cultural visitor economy’ (CVE).

We held a conference in September 2012 and one of the things that happened on the day was that participants came up with new project ideas – we agreed to seed-fund two of them.

One of the Crossovers logos
One of the Crossovers logos

This year we’re offering two more grants of £1,500 to new projects in the south-east of England that address our key themes: culture, the visitor economy and economic development.

Do you have an idea for a new creative project in the visitor economy?

Have you been thinking about how to bring more tourists to your area using the arts?

Have you been discussing how your cultural project can contribute to your local economy?

We want to see this money being used to kick start innovative projects in the south-east of England.  We don’t want to give you a burden of paperwork that takes up your time when you could be busier doing more creative, effective things.

Using funding from Arts Council England South East, we’ve created a process in which you can enter the competition quickly, with the minimum of form filling, and then, if you win, you can get on with getting your project going.

Here’s how you enter:

Fill in this form

Return it, by email to by the 1st February 2013

We will make a decision about the two projects that best help us to support new relationships between tourism, culture and economic development in the south-east, and we’ll announce this on 11th February.


Social media and tourism marketing: Margate vs. Easyjet

Last week, I posted a photo on twitter. I took it on a Southeastern train that was going from London to Kent. This is the photo:


Within an hour or so, my tweet was being re-tweeted and the photo was popping up on twitter and Facebook. When I woke up the next day, it was appearing on blogs and I was being emailed by journalists to ask for more details.

This advert provoked strong reactions for a few reasons:

  • Easyjet were suggesting that Margate was a second-class destination, that you wouldn’t go to unless it was all you could afford.
  • Margate has been undergoing huge developments, not least the opening of turner contemporary. It was recently voted one of the top must-see destinations in the world by Rough Guides. Easyjet seemed to be ignorant of this or, worse, deliberately mis-representing the destination
  • The advert was placed on a train that served the destination that it was insulting.  This last point isn’t really an objection to Easyjet, but to Southeastern Trains.  They have been supporters of Visit Kent, the DMO for the region, but they have also recently supported the regeneration of Margate through their high-profile PR link-up with Margate’s Mary Portas-supported town centre revival project.

Over the course of a few days on twitter, the extent of public anger about this advertising campaign was made clear to Easyjet.  Margate’s Mayor used twitter particularly effectively to complain to the airline.

On Monday, Easyjet formally apologised and withdrew the campaign.  This was reported locally, but also nationally, in the Independent and Telegraph newspapers and on the ITV news website.

This is a fascinating example of how communities in tourism destinations can influence how they are perceived and marketed, thanks to the power of social media and the access that this gives communities to the media and tourism businesses.  Admittedly, this kind of negative advertising is quite rare.  In fact, it most closely resembles the kind of comparative tourism marketing that helped to kill off towns like Margate in the 1960s, when English tourists were first shown the delights of Sun, Sand and Sangria.

Local gourmet Pizza company, GB Pizza, came up with this witty response to Easyjet’s campaign, I wonder how far we agree?